Yes No Share to Facebook
Claiming Disgorgement Remedy Involves Taking Benefits or Profits Away From a Wrongdoer
Question: How can a victim of wrongdoing receive compensation if there is no direct loss but the wrongdoer benefits?
Answer: When a wrongdoer profits from wrongdoing without causing direct harm, the legal concept of disgorgement may apply. This principle allows for the stripping of ill-gotten gains from the wrongdoer, ensuring they cannot benefit from the act, thus deterring future misconduct. According to Pharmascience v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals, 2020 ONSC 6534, disgorgement is typically used when damages are inadequate, such as breaches of fiduciary duty, trust, or in exceptional cases of crime, contract breaches, or torts. Disgorgement ensures fairness and serves as a preventative measure against wrongful conduct. For further understanding of such legal matters, contact Civil Litigations Paralegal Services at (416) 229-1479.
What Can a Victim of Wrongdoing Claim In a Lawsuit If the Victim Was Without the Suffering of a Loss But the Wrongdoer Received a Benefit or Profit From the Wrongdoing?
When a Wrongdoer Benefits or Profits From a Wrongdoing, the Victim of the Wrongdoing May Claim Disgorgement of the Benefits or Profits From the Wrongdoer.
Understanding Disgorgement Remedy Principles Involving Restitution For Wrongdoings Resulting In Ill Gotten Gains
There are some circumstances in which a wrongdoer receives a benefit or profit from the wrongdoing and yet the victim is without a corresponding harm or loss. Generally, under legal principles akin to no harm, no foul concepts, a legitimate lawsuit permits compensation for the loss or harm suffered by the victim; however, in some circumstances it is proper to claim disgorgement of benefits or profits received by the wrongdoer.
The Law
The availability of the remedy of disgorgement was well explained within the case of Pharmascience Inc. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc., et al, 2020 ONSC 6534, wherein it was said:
[19] Under the “profiting from wrong” theory of unjust enrichment, disgorgement may be available if the defendant has committed “an underlying legal wrong against a plaintiff, and the ordinary damages remedy for the underlying wrong is inadequate”. As the Court of Appeal noted, disgorgement in these cases is typically reserved for when there has been a breach of fiduciary duty or a breach of trust. However, in exceptional cases, disgorgement as a restitutionary remedy can also be granted where the “underlying legal wrong” is a crime or a breach of contract or a tort.[6] In cases premised on “profiting from wrong”, the concept of “corresponding deprivation” takes on a slightly different meaning. A plaintiff may be able to prove a corresponding loss by showing that the defendant’s gain was “made possible” by the defendant’s wrongful act towards the plaintiff rather than proving a direct or indirect transfer of wealth.[7]
Explained Principles
There may be circumstances where a person commits a criminal fraud or a civil fraud, among other wrongs, without causing harm or loss to the wronged person and yet benefits or profits arise in favour of the wrongdoer. Courts, seeking to discourage wrongful conduct, may order that the ill gotten gains be disgorged, meaning taken away, from the wrongdoer and granted to the victim. Essentially, disgorgement remedy is used to ensure that a wrongdoer fails to benefit or profit from acts of wrongdoing especially in circumstances where the victim was unharmed, or suffered only little harm, by the misconduct of the wrongdoer.
Summary Comment
Disgorgement is a restitutionary remedy rather than a compensatory remedy, meaning that the law applies disgorgement as a matter of fairness rather than as a matter of making a victim whole for loss or harm suffered by the victim.
